The fate of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard – and whether either side will be liable for millions in damages in their dueling defamation cases – lies in the hands of a Virginia jury.

Seven jurors overseeing the Fairfax trial will decide whether Heard, 36, defamed Depp, 58, when she wrote a 2018 Washington Post op-ed piece calling herself “a public figure representing domestic abuse.”

The jury must also determine whether she should be on the hook for millions in damages.

“The jury is going to determine damages for both the claim and the counterclaim,” sources close to Heard’s legal team told The Post. “If the jury finds Amber was liable for Mr. Depp it would determine damages, if it was found that Mr. Depp was liable for Amber’s counterclaims it makes a determination of damages. “

The “Aquaman” actress – who once dated Depp and was married to him for 15 months – does not risk prison time since she does not face any criminal charges, just civil claims.

The “Pirates of the Caribbean” actor filed his $ 50 million defamation suit against Heard claiming she harmed his reputation and career – costing him tens of millions – when she penned the op-ed.

The jury must decide if Amber Heard defamed her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, when she penned a 2018 Washington Post op-ed about domestic abuse.
AP

Heard did not name Depp in the essay, but his attorneys argue it still defamed him because it was clearly referencing allegations of domestic abuse made his ex-wife when she filed for divorce in 2016 and got a temporary restraining order against him.

Depp denies ever physically hurting Heard, and has claimed that she was the abusive one in their relationship. Heard, meanwhile, has accused Depp of assaulting her dozens of times.

The actress then filed defamation counterclaims for 100 million – alleging Depp was carrying out a “smear campaign” to ruin her life.

The pair have been duking it out before a jury at a Fairfax County Courthouse for four weeks. The trial is currently on a one-week recess.

Johnny Depp in court
Depp denies he ever physically abused Heard, but the “Aquaman” actress claims he assaulted her dozens of times during their relationship.
AP

The latest from the Johnny Depp defamation trial:


Closing arguments are set for May 27 and the jury could begin deliberating the estranged couple’s fate soon after.

There is also a possibility that the jury could be unpersuaded by either side and determine neither Depp nor Heard should be awarded damages, the source close to Heard’s legal team said.

A Depp spokesperson confirmed, “Jury decides damages and yes it is possible that no damages are awarded.”

If the jury doesn’t find Heard should be on the hook in Depp’s case, she would be entitled to recoup the cost of her legal fees from Depp. That amount would be determined by a judge at a later point, the sources said.

Amber Heard testifies in court
Heard, 36, does not risk a prison sentence if the jury rules in Depp’s favor because she isn’t facing any criminal charges – only civil claims.
EPA
Johnny Depp fans carry signs outside court
Fans have been crowding outside the Virginia court throughout the trial, brandishing signs in support of Depp
Ron Sachs / CNP

But should Depp succeed, it could have a “chilling effect” that would discourage other alleged victims from coming forward, said Halim Dhanidina, a former California judge and current criminal defense attorney.

“Any time a defamation lawsuit is successful, it has a chilling effect on speech,” Dhanidina said.

“There has always been a chilling effect for victims to come forward and speak out against institutions or entities or people with power because they feel like their world could come crashing down on them,” she continued.

If the hypothetical win also leads to a substantial money judgment awarded to Depp, “then I’m sure there are people out there who would think twice about making statements if those statements could expose them to legal liability,” Dhanidina said.

On the other hand, “we don’t want to create a world where people feel like they can say whatever they want even if they know it’s not true,” the former judge noted.

“A verdict will have a chilling effect one way or the other regardless of what the verdict is,” Dhanidina said.

Source Link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.