While Warner Bros. is preparing to begin production on its own film about the clown prince of crime, 2024 Joker: Madness for Two (2019 sequel clown), the studio has brought down the legal hammer on The People’s Joker, a parody film that spoofed not only the Batman villain but a ton of other DC Comics characters. Screened last night at the Toronto International Film Festival during the “Midnight” programming block, public joker It has been described by its writer/director/producer/star Vera Drew as “an illegal coming-of-age comic book movie”. The film’s trailer can still be viewed, showing just how much DC iconography has carved into the film’s crosshairs.
After a screening of the film, public joker It has been completely withdrawn from TIFF and its future is largely uncertain. An update on the official TIFF website reads: “The filmmaker has withdrawn this film due to rights issues. We apologize for any inconvenience. To current ticket holders with their purchase information from TIFF customer relations Will receive an email.” Critics were still present for the film’s initial screening, although details about the film’s content and which characters appear in it have begun to surface online.
What is People’s Joker?
Although the fans seem to be in the same camp as the movies, public joker The film is a feature-length film that has been described as “coming in a line of the Young Joker origin story”. The film’s official description reads: “After years of numbing himself with irony and an inhalant named Smilex, an oddly ambitious sparring with gender identity, first love and old enemies while setting up an illegal comedy theater in Gotham City Joker battling. This is a strange coming-of-age Joker origin story. Completely unlicensed by DC and Warner Bros. Starring and directed by Vera Drew (“Beef House,” “Who’s America”). Three Different Featuring the work of 200 independent artists across continents, all created during a global pandemic.”
Will The People’s Joker Ever Be Released?
Although a title card Appeared last night ahead of the film’s premiere, indicating that it is “a parody” and “completely unauthorized by DC Comics, Warner Bros. or anyone claiming ownership of the trademark,” it is uncertain whether the film What could be the future of
Drew also addressed the situation in the film. PremiereTelling the crowd: “People don’t want you to see this movie. I’m not going to go into details because my team will kill me, but people don’t want you to see this movie and I can’t remember the last time anybody. Really said and meant it.”
Which DC characters are in The People’s Joker?
Some reviews for the film have confirmed that in addition to several parodies of The Joker, other DC characters appear in the film (including not only Joaquin Phoenix but also Jared Leto’s version). Polygon notes that Tim and Eric Regular David Liebe Hart appears as Ra’s Al Ghul, while former SNL star plays Sarah Sherman SNL Producer Lorne Michaels. The film also featured variations on The Penguin, Scarecrow, Riddler, Bane and Harley Quinn, as well as DC locations such as Smallville and Arkham Asylum.
Is People’s Joker illegal?
The film is shrouded in a huge gray area, although the filmmakers argue that it fits under fair use. The title card for the trailer also indicates that “all material used falls under fair use, Title 17, protected under US Code 107-118.” This strategy has been employed for many years.
There is actually a four part test that is extensively used legally to determine whether something actually falls under fair use which includes:
- purpose and nature of use; Is it for commercial use or is it not for profit/educational/transformation?
- the amount and adequacy of the work used; Is there a larger part or “heart of the work” from other materials or is it a small part/non-existent part of the work?
- the nature of the copyrighted work; Is it an unpublished work/based on a work of fiction or is it a published work/based on fact?
- the impact of use on the market; Will the release of the work deprive the producer of income or will it not affect their income at all?
In fact, The People’s Joker may very well have a case for winning the fair use argument. While a fair amount of DC IP has been used in this, the transformative nature of the whole thing is unlike anything done in their comics or their feature films; Not to mention that almost no one in their right mind would look at this product and believe it was an official Warner Bros. product, seemingly not hurting their bottom line. to that end public joker Might very well try and fight it, but that would be the hardest part,
Although speaking in an interview with Collider, Drew revealed: “I think this film can be distributed 100%. It is fully protected under fair use and copyright law. Like a parody law. The only thing that makes it weird in both of those categories is no one has ever taken the character and the IP and really personalizes it that way. So I guess that’s what I really think Sounds far more dangerous…. Virtually no reason for anyone to worry, I think of the legal repercussions with it. Without getting into that, we’ve gone really far to make sure That we can do that. I probably wouldn’t spend two years of my life making a really illegal Joker movie.”