Prince Harry ‘feared he would become a has-been once his nephew George turned 18’

A new book claims the Duke of Sussex was ‘fixed’ after his nephew Prince George turned 18.

It alleges that Harry feared ‘too-run’ before meeting Meghan ‘for a long time’.

The book states that this apparently exacerbated the frustration when colleagues spoke to William and Kate of the things they wanted to separate.

Excerpts from Courtesans: The Hidden Power Behind the Crown by Valentine Low was published by The Times Last Night.

The book also boasts about Meghan’s dealings with employees. On one occasion the Duchess of Sussex is said to have strongly criticized a plan drawn up by a young female employee in front of colleagues.

William later tried to console the unnamed staff member by saying that she was doing a good job and the woman burst into tears.

A new book claims the Duke of Sussex was ‘fixed’ after his nephew Prince George turned 18.

It alleges that Harry 'long feared' before meeting Meghan that he would 'run too'

It alleges that Harry ‘long feared’ before meeting Meghan that he would ‘run too’

The book also boasts about Meghan's dealings with employees.  On one occasion the Duchess of Sussex is said to have strongly criticized a plan drawn up by a young female employee in front of colleagues.

The book also boasts about Meghan’s dealings with employees. On one occasion the Duchess of Sussex is said to have strongly criticized a plan drawn up by a young female employee in front of colleagues.

Following Meghan and Harry’s wedding, the Queen’s former assistant private secretary, Samantha Cohen, joined their team as her interim private secretary.

A source is quoted in the book as saying that she too was ‘bullyed’ and that whatever she did was not enough for the couple.

Quote The claim of a source once said: ‘Sama’ [Cohen] Always clarified that it was like working for some teenagers. They were impossible and pushed him to the limit. She was pathetic.

The Duchess’s lawyers denied in 2021 that Miss Cohen had been bullied, saying the couple were forever grateful for her support and dedication.

She has long called such allegations “largely false” and the Duchess has “absolutely denied” bullying anyone.

While an investigation commissioned by Buckingham Palace concluded that it would review how it handled complaints of bullying, it did not say that the Duchess had actually bullied anyone.

Poll shows increased support for the monarchy

A poll shows that support for the monarchy has increased after the Queen’s funeral.

Some 47 per cent believe it will be worse if Britain is abolished, the survey of 1,000 adults found – up from 42 per cent who said the same in June.

Only 22 per cent said that abolishing the monarchy would improve Britain, down slightly from 23 per cent. The survey also showed that 56 percent still expect the monarchy to last for at least 50 years, up from 45 percent in March this year.

The proportion that said Charles III would make a good king has risen from 49 percent to 61 percent, which is close to the level of support for Prince William, who is expected to do a good job in the role when 72 percent of the time.

Ipsos chief executive Kelly Beaver, who conducted the survey, said: ‘King Charles began his reign with most Britons optimistic that he would build a good king and an increased belief in the longevity of the monarchy.’

The book also tells how Meghan clashed with her personal assistant Melissa Toubati over freebies including clothes, jewelery and candles that some companies sent to the Duchess.

Ms Tauabati, who quit her job just six months after joining the palace, followed the rule that members of the royal family could not accept gifts from commercial organizations, but the book claims that her approach is ‘along with Meghan’. not good’.

The book is to be published by Headline Books on 6 October.

In June, Buckingham Palace effectively buried a report into allegations of bullying by the Duchess of Sussex.

Royal colleagues acknowledged for the first time that the findings would never be made public.

A source told the Daily Mail at the time: ‘People suspected it would be buried, and now it looks like it is.’

The Daily Mail understands that even those participating in the inquiry have not been told what the outcome is.

Palace officials will only confirm that their investigation has concluded and that ‘recommendations on our policy and procedures’ have been put forward.

Royal aides announced in March last year that they were launching an investigation into claims that Meghan’s ‘abusive’ behavior while a working member of the royal family kicked two female personal assistants out of the house and a third’s ‘trust’ reduced’.

The employees are said to have been in tears and feeling ‘painful’ – with some comparing their condition to post-traumatic stress.

The Royal House hired a third-party law firm, paid privately by the family, to investigate claims in a move that some predicament could increase tensions between Harry and Meghan and the ‘entity’ .

The allegations have always been strongly denied by the Duchess, whose lawyers at the time described them as a ‘math smear campaign’.

Following Meghan and Harry's wedding, Samantha Cohen (pictured), the Queen's former assistant private secretary, joins their team as their interim private secretary

Following Meghan and Harry’s wedding, Samantha Cohen (pictured), the Queen’s former assistant private secretary, joins their team as their interim private secretary

Last year a palace spokesman clarified that the specifics of the allegations - which were brought to the attention of senior domestic staff by Harry and Meghan's respective press secretary at the time, Jason Knauf (above) - would not be investigated

Last year a palace spokesman clarified that the specifics of the allegations – which were brought to the attention of senior domestic staff by Harry and Meghan’s respective press secretary at the time, Jason Knauf (above) – would not be investigated

Last year a palace spokesman clarified that the specifics of the allegations – which were brought to the attention of senior domestic staff by Harry and Meghan’s respective press secretary at the time, Jason Knauf – would not be investigated.

But he said he would investigate how “historic allegations of bullying” were handled by the authorities and whether any changes should be made to their human resources policies and procedures as a result.

A spokesperson confirmed that “if” those findings were to be made public, they would be included in this year’s Sovereign Grants Report – the official annual review into the royal family’s public finances.

But announcing the report yesterday, Sir Michael Stevens, Master of the Privy Purse, said of the investigation: ‘There is nothing on this in the report.

“As we said last year, this work was done privately and no sovereign grant money was spent on it.

“The review has been completed and the recommendations on our (HR) policy and procedures have been put forward.” But we will not comment further.

Did Harry turn down dinner over the Duchess’ excommunication?

by David Wilkes

Prince Harry refused to have dinner with his father and brother after Meghan was banned from attending the family on the day of the Queen’s death.

The Duke of Sussex, 38, was reportedly ‘furious’ when King Charles called to tell him it was ‘not appropriate’ for Meghan, 41, to accompany him to the Scottish estate on 8 September.

William made an RAF flight to Scotland with his uncles Andrew and Edward. But Harry is said to have missed it because he was ‘so busy trying to get Meghan to Balmoral and go sailing with her family’.

Asked to make his own travel arrangements, he landed at Aberdeen airport without the Duchess of Sussex before the world, minutes after the Queen’s death was announced.

There was no suggestion Kate will be joining William, but the Sussexes are said to have announced that morning Meghan and Harry were on their way – but by noon plans had changed.

Today, The Sun reports that Harry was invited to dine at Birkhall, his father’s home on the Balmoral estate, with the King, William and Camilla, the Queen’s consort, on the night of the Queen’s death. But he was said to have stayed at Balmoral Castle with the Earl and Countess of Wessex and the Duke of York.

A source told the newspaper: ‘Charles has an open invitation for Harry to dine with him whenever he is in the country. But Harry was so angry that he refused to eat with his father and brother.

‘And he left as soon as possible to catch the first commercial flight from Balmoral to London.’

Source link